Thursday, July 27, 2006

WWIII and the New Status Quo Ante Agenda

http://infowars.net/articles/july2006/260706WWIII.htm

WWIII and the New Status Quo Ante Agenda
Long term three world war agenda unfolding in the here and now

Steve Watson / Infowars | July 26 2006

Condoleeza Rice's statement today that a return to the 'political Status Quo Ante' is not an option is very revealing in terms of what we are to expect in the coming weeks months and years.

Despite the fact that every nation on the planet, barring the two globalist control centres of the US and the UK wants an immediate ceasefire and an end to the killing, a ceasefire is not what we are going to get.

What does this reveal about who is in control of modern political events? The elite few and not the many are running the entire show and what they say goes because they have the international bankers and their long established financial systems of enslavement onside to ply them with endless wealth to fund the killing and reap back the profits.

The political world is going to be changed for ever by a totally staged managed escalation of violence that will foment a pre-scripted third world war.

The US media is for the most part hideously spewing out what will inevitably be written in the history books. Today's Chicago Times editorial succinctly sums up the total falsehood that may become known as the catalytic event after 9/11 that started World War Three:

Hezbollah started this conflict by invading Israel and killing and kidnapping soldiers...

In reality it is the exact opposite that is the case. Israel sent troops over the Lebanese border into the South of the country and then claimed the captured invaders were "kidnap victims" and launched their attacks.

The Associated press reported this, The AFP reported this, the Hindustan Times reported this, the Bahrain News Agency reported this, The Deutsche Presse-Agentur reported this, The Asia Times reported this, voltairenet reported this. in fact every foreign media outlet reported this, yet the US media reports that the exact opposite happened.

It has also now been revealed that Israeli spy networks, long in operation in Lebanon, were on alert, scoping out targets to be destroyed four days before the two Israeli soldiers were captured in Lebanon.

The Jeruslaem post reported on the 12th of July that only weeks ago, an entire reserve division was drafted in order to train for the operation along the northern border. In the same report a very high ranking military officer said that if the captured soldiers were not returned in good condition, Israel would turn Lebanon back 20 years by striking its vital infrastructure.

Clearly whether the vital infrastructure of Lebanon was under the control of Hezbollah or not was not an issue for Israel.

"The IDF holds the Lebanese government responsible for any act of terror launched from Lebanon at Israel," a statement released by the IDF spokesperson read.

More from the Chicago Times:

If Hezbollah wants a cease-fire--and there's little evidence of that--it would be simple to accomplish...

Little evidence? What about the fact there was an immediate offer by Hezbollah to release the soldiers, as well as long term hostage and IDF soldier Gilad Shalit, in exchange for thousands of security prisoners? The offer of an immediate truce and talks has again been seemingly snubbed today by Israel.

Simple to accomplish? So what about the indiscriminate wiping out by Israel of Lebanese civilians, the airport and even United Nations outposts, killing UN observers ON PURPOSE despite repeated warnings. What about the repeated statements, from the Prime Minister of Israel Ehud Olmert, that the bombing will not stop. Is all that a side issue?

The activities of Israel are a fuse that has been lit to ignite the order out of chaos agenda in the middle east that will eventually lead to all out war, the systematic destruction of sovereignty throughout the region and endless globalist occupation and plundering. No one can now deny that the level the violence has been taken to is totally out of all proportion to the events used to justify it. Anyone can see that this has gone beyond a matter of destroying a loosely organized foreign movement. Even State leaders admit the leadership of Israel is pursuing wider agendas.

The globalist agenda for a third world war focused on the middle east has been long spoken of and written about.

In 1826; Captain William Morgan published an exposure of the powerful masonic movement that had been long infiltrated at the highest levels by the European Illuminati movement. Morgan decided it was his duty to inform all Masons and the general public what the full proof was regarding the Illuminati, their secret plans, intended objectives, and to reveal the identities of the masterminds of the conspiracy.

Morgan wrote:

World War III is to be fomented, using the so-called controversies; by the agents of the Illuminati operating under whatever new name; that are now being stored up between the political Zionists and the leaders of the Moslem world.

That war is to be directed in such a manner that all of Islam and political Zionism will destroy each other while at the same time; the remaining nations, once more divided on this issue, will be forced to fight themselves into a state of complete exhaustion; physically, mentally, spiritually, and economically.

Zionism at this time was not an established term or movement, it was unheard of yet here we have a Mason writing openly about it as a future force in the world.

The writing of Albert Pike, the Grand Commander of American Freemasonry, later in 1871 also reveals the same Masonic/Illuminati agenda. Predicting both the first and second world wars would lead to the break up of Germany, the expansion of Communist Russia and the establishment of the State of Israel. The next 75 years and beyond unfolded exactly as Pike described.

Pike wrote:

The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World,

The [third] war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. The rest of the world will be drawn in. "Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion...

Pike stated that after World War III is ended; those who will aspire to undisputed world-domination will provoke the greatest social-cataclysm the world has ever known, an all powerful malevolent unipolar world order. He stated that the agenda was to "unleash the nihilists and the atheists" and bring this about via "a general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and Atheism; both conquered and exterminated at the same time."

Essentially Pike foresaw that in order to bring about the Illuminati vision of an all conquering world government, the previously established strong hold religions must be pitted against each other AND against Atheist Communism, exhausting all beliefs and political systems to the point where the world cannot look back to the former Status Quo Ante and must await a new beginning.

The turmoil in the Middle East is the start of this new beginning.

The centre of power amongst the globalists, or "those who will aspire to undisputed world-domination" as Pike put it, may have shifted, evolved, grown and changed over the last century, but it seems that the overall order out of chaos agenda is still as it was.

Thursday, July 20, 2006

From Israel to Lebanon

http://fromisraeltolebanon.info/

Monday, July 17, 2006

'Police... open up, we know you've made a mess in there'

'Police... open up, we know you've made a mess in there'
By Toby Harnden in Arlington, Virginia

(Filed: 16/07/2006)

Sam Shipkovitz viewed his home as his castle, a place where he could pile his possessions from floor to ceiling and answer to no one.

Unfortunately, his local hoarding task force saw things a little differently. The latest victim of what he brands "America's neatness police", Mr Shipkovitz, a patent lawyer, returned home one evening to find that the locks on his apartment door had been changed. A bright yellow sign stated: "Unfit for Human Habitation."

read the rest,
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=YZXTVRFQNXL1VQFIQMFCFFWAVCBQYIV0?xml=/news/2006/07/16/wjunk16.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/07/16/ixnews.html

Three Soldiers Kidnapped - Gas Heads To $4 A Gallon

http://www.rense.com/general72/tnree.htm

[editor's note: this article brings up a good point - "Illuminati" (globalist, NWO, etc) planned wars for profit.]

Three Soldiers Kidnapped -
Gas Heads To $4 A Gallon

By Michael Shore in Israel
v1
7-17-6
Watch what is currently going on in Israel and you can observe the Illuminati in action.
Three Israeli soldiers are supposedly kidnapped by hamas/hezbollah. No one outside of the inner circle of government knows for sure what really happened and what is going on. Instead of going through diplomatic channels to try and get back the so-called kidnapped soldiers, Olmert and his Israeli/Arab partners in crime immediately escalate this supposed kidnapping event into a WAR FOR PROFIT. The Israelis start bombing in Beirut and other places and the Arabs start bombing Israel.To put into action any military operation takes much planning and could take many months of preparation, which means that this plan was hatched before the Israeli soldiers were supposedly kidnapped. Even the so-called kidnapping can be a part of the plan.
If you understand that the Illuminati control BOTH the Israeli and Arab governments with their multi-TRILLION dollar WAR CHEST, it becomes easier to get the picture of what's going on. So far unfortunately over 200 Arabs and over 100 Israelis have been killed or wounded over the supposed kidnapping of just THREE PEOPLE. Millions of dollars in damages has been caused from the bombings in Lebanon and Israel etc.
Now here's the part that gives away that this whole atrocious killing event was planned in advance. WHO BENEFITS from all this? Oil went to a new record high of over $78 a barrel , so we can definitely say that the Illuminati connected oil corporations are benefiting by billions of dollars, as oil at the pump is on its way to $4 a gallon. This gang of thieves, the Illuminati, needed some kind of event to get the people to accept $4/gallon oil and this is the $4/gallon event. And what does the sick oil soaked Bush regime say about all this? Let the war continue,we're going to make more billions for ourselves.
Here's an article that talks about oil tripling in price if Iran is attacked. People have their heads buried in the sand if they don't think these WARS FOR PROFITS are not about MONEY, trillions of dollars of Iraqi OIL, Afghani{Caspian Sea} OIL, Iranian OIL..
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2006/06/20/world-oil-prices-could-tr_n_23415.html
Plus millions {possibly billions} of dollars of property that is destroyed by bombs etc.will need to be rebuilt, so the Illuminati connected construction companies who will get these contracts will benefit, as they have in Iraq and Afghanistan. And of course the Illuminati connected war corporations are right there in the forefront benefiting by more billions of dollars from the new military contracts they will get. How much do you think one bomb costs that is dropped from a plane? Or one artillery shell that is shot from a cannon? Or one missile that is shot at a target? Or one ship that is blown up?etc.etc.etc.
This unfortunately is just the beginning. Will this be the lead event of the Illuminati's march to attack Iran or for them to do another one of their 911 style events in the U.S.A.? How many more lives will be lost or destroyed by the criminal gangs in control of governments, American, Arab and Israeli etc., whose leaders and associates in crime make MONEY from war? And all this killing, violence and destruction is being blamed on the supposed kidnapping of JUST THREE PEOPLE! Does this make any sense at all? It can only be described as insane.
Hopefully people can finally wake up to the Illuminati WAR FOR PROFITS SCAM that they continually perpetrate. Tell as many people as you can to STOP giving their sons and daughters to the criminal armies of these gangsters, who unfortunately hoodwink the public all the time and make billions of dollars for themselves, even if it means killing innocent babies, children and adults.
WHO ARE THE ILLUMINATI?
http://www.illuminati-news.com/moriah.htm
http://www.illuminati-news.com/shadow-gov.htm
STOP THE KILLING OF HUMAN BEINGS!
Michael Shore

Israel Said Using DU, Poison Gas On Lebanese

http://www.rense.com/general72/lleb.htm

[editor's note: while this article doesn't site any specific sources for the use of chemical weapons, the section that I wanted to bring to the reader's attention is the defiance of the Geneva Conventions.]

Israel Said Using DU,
Poison Gas On Lebanese

By Wayne Madsen
Excluvise To WMR
7-17-6
Our intelligence sources in Lebanon have reported to us exclusively that Israel is now using poison gas and depleted uranium shells on towns in the south of Lebanon. Residents of the small village of Kasarshoba became violently ill, experiencing severe vomiting, after the Israelis hit the village with poison gas. In other cases, underground shelters in southern Lebanon were hit by Israeli depleted uranium shells. Our sources also report that the entire southern suburbs of southern Beirut, with a population of 800,000, have been totally depopulated. Israel has targeted thousands of civilian homes for destruction.
Meanwhile, Israeli government spokespersons and Bush administration officials took to the Sunday morning talking head programs in Washington to defend Israel's barbarous actions. The networks failed to present the views of Lebanese government spokespersons. Israel's and the Bush administration's line is that Israeli attacks are "precision targeted." Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice pointedly refused to criticize Israel on ABC's This Week.
Israeli Kadima (ex-Likud) Prime Minister Ehud Olmert joins Ariel Sharon in annals of Israeli leaders who committed war crimes in Lebanon.
American media is failing to report that the Israeli attacks on Lebanon and Gaza, like the U.S. attacks in Iraq, are violations of the Fourth Geneva Convention and Additional Protocols governing military attacks on civilians by governments that are parties to the conventions:
Civilians are not to be subject to attack. This includes direct attacks on civilians and indiscriminate attacks against areas in which civilians are present.
There is to be no destruction of property unless justified by military necessity.
Warring parties must not use or develop biological or chemical weapons
http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/

Foreign companies buying U.S. roads, bridges that taxpayers built

http://www.startribune.com/484/story/554337.html

July 15, 2006 – 11:27 AM

Foreign companies buying U.S. roads, bridges that taxpayers built

Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Roads and bridges built by U.S. taxpayers are starting to be sold off, and so far foreign-owned companies are doing the buying.

On a single day in June, an Australian-Spanish partnership paid $3.8 billion to lease the Indiana Toll Road. An Australian company bought a 99-year lease on Virginia's Pocahontas Parkway, and Texas officials decided to let a Spanish-American partnership build and run a toll road from Austin to Seguin for 50 years.

Few people know that the tolls from the U.S. side of the tunnel between Detroit and Windsor, Canada, go to a subsidiary of an Australian company — which also owns a bridge in Alabama.

Some experts welcome the trend. Robert Poole, transportation director for the conservative think tank Reason Foundation, said private investors can raise more money than politicians to build new roads because these kind of owners are willing to raise tolls.

"They depoliticize the tolling decision,'' Poole said. Besides, he said, foreign companies have purchased infrastructure in Europe for years; only now are U.S. companies beginning to get into the business of buying roads and bridges.

Gas taxes and user fees have fueled the expansion of the nation's highway system. Thousands of miles of roads built since the 1950s changed the landscape, accelerating the growth of suburbia and creating a reliance on motor vehicles to move freight, get to work and take vacations.

In 1956, President Eisenhower pushed to create the interstate highway system for a different: to move troops and tanks and evacuate civilians.

The Bush administration's plan to let a foreign company manage U.S. ports met a storm of protest in February. But plans to sell or lease highways to companies outside the United States have not met such resistance.

John Foote, senior fellow at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, said the government can take over a highway in an emergency. But he objects to selling roads to raise cash.

But that is just what Chicago has done.

Last year, the city sold a 99-year lease on the eight-mile Chicago Skyway for $1.83 billion. The buyer was the same consortium that leased the Indiana Toll Road — Macquarie Infrastructure Group of Sydney, Australia, and Cintra Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte of Madrid, Spain.

Chicago used the money to pay off debt and fund road projects. Skyway tolls rose 50 cents, to $2.50; By 2017, they will reach $5.

The Indiana Toll Road lease is a better deal, Foote thinks, because the proceeds will pay for urgent projects such as road and bridge improvements.

That need is precisely why cities and states have begun to look to foreign investors.

Between 1980 and 2004, people drove 94 percent more highway miles, according to Federal Highway Administration statistics. But the number of new highway lane miles rose by only 6 percent.

Washington is not likely to produce more money to build roads. The federal highway fund — which will have a balance of about $16 billion by the end of 2006 — will run out in 2009 or 2010, according to White House and congressional estimates.

About half the states now let companies build and operate roads. Many changed their laws recently to do so.

So Illinois lawmakers are examining privatizing the Illinois Tollway, New Jersey lawmakers are considering selling 49 percent of the state's two big toll roads and a gubernatorial candidate in Ohio wants to sell the turnpike.

Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, who championed his state's toll road deal, now wants investors to build and operate a toll road from Indianapolis to Evansville.

Patrick Bauer, the Indiana House's Democratic leader, says such deals are taxpayer rip-offs.

Bauer believes Macquarie-Cintra could make $133 billion over the 75-year life of the Indiana Toll Road lease — for which Indiana got $3.8 billion.

"In five, maybe 10 years, all that money is gone, and the tolls keep rising and the money keeps flowing into the foreign coffers,'' Bauer said.

Orange County, Calif., got burned by a toll-road lease for a different reason.

The road, part of state Route 91, was built and run for $130 million by California Private Transportation Company, partly owned by France-based Compagnie Financiere et Industrielle des Autoroutes. The toll road opened in 1995.

Seven years later, Orange County was looking at gridlock. But it could not build more roads because of a provision in the lease. So it bought back the lease — for $207.5 million.

To encourage more domestic investment in highways, former Transportation Secretary Norman Y. Mineta made a pitch to Wall Street on May 23.

"The time is now for United States investors — including our financial, construction and engineering institutions — to get involved in transportation investments,'' said Mineta, who left office July 7.

U.S. companies are getting the message.

San Antonio-based Zachry Construction Co., along with Cintra, received approval on June 29 for a 50-year lease to build and run a toll road from Austin to Seguin for $1.3 billion.

That is part of Texas Gov. Rick Perry's vision to attract more than $80 billion in private funds for roads by 2030. He wants a new tollway from Oklahoma to Mexico and the Gulf Coast, and one from Shreveport, La., and Texarkana to Mexico. Cintra-Zachry reached a $7.2 billion deal last year to develop the project's first phase.

Not everyone in Texas buys the idea. Harris County officials recently voted against selling three toll roads. Also, independent gubernatorial candidate Carole Keeton Strayhorn opposes Perry's toll road plan.

"Texas freeways belong to Texans, not foreign companies,'' she said.

Friday, July 14, 2006

'Black boxes' in cars raise concerns about privacy

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/nation/stories/DN-blackboxdog_02nat.ART.State.Bulldog.240a842.htm

'Black boxes' in cars raise concerns about privacy

Most motorists not aware actions before accidents are recorded

12:00 AM CDT on Sunday, July 2, 2006

By REBECCA CARR Cox News Service

WASHINGTON – A privacy battle is brewing over devices being installed in most new cars that record how drivers react in the seconds leading up to accidents.

Federal safety experts love the so-called black boxes because they can determine such things as whether drivers in a crash wore seat belts, exceeded the speed limit or accelerated when they should have braked.

But privacy groups, consumer advocates and lawmakers say most motorists have no idea that the black boxes are recording their movements.

"I am willing to bet that most members of Congress don't know that there are black boxes in most new cars," said Rep. Michael Capuano, D-Mass. Mr. Capuano is worried that the information will be misused and violate individual privacy rights.

"What's next, a GPS [Global Positioning System] in my suit jacket?" he asked.

Mr. Capuano plans to introduce legislation with Rep. Mary Bono, R-Calif., in the coming weeks that would require automakers to inform consumers about the existence of the recording devices and how to disable them.

The black boxes, formally called "event data recorders" (EDRs), are raising concerns among consumer and privacy rights groups about who can access the collected information and how that information can be used.

It's a big issue because the black boxes, which are small enough to hold in your hand, have been installed in an estimated 40 million cars since the mid-1990s.

By all accounts, the devices make it easier for police and insurance companies to figure out what went wrong in an accident and who is at fault.

Use by insurers

Privacy advocates worry that they would allow insurance companies to infer bad driving habits even if a driver has never been cited.

That could lead to imposing higher insurance rates or refusing to provide insurance, even though a driver might have a clean record, said Eric Skrum, spokesman for the National Motorists Association, a Wisconsin-based motorists' rights group.

"Most people don't know that black boxes exist for cars, so most don't understand the ramifications," Mr. Skrum said.

The devices capture up to 10 seconds immediately before an accident and 300 milliseconds of data during an actual crash. Unlike the flight data recorders in airplanes, the boxes do not record conversations or locations of the car.

But in the future, Mr. Skrum said, the information could be linked to the Global Positioning System to track where the car went in addition to the driver's behavior.

"That information could be shared with your insurance carrier, and your rates can go up," Mr. Skrum said.

The insurance industry is taking a wait-and-see approach to the data recorders. It wants to learn how the government will regulate the boxes' use before using their data.

"This is not a widespread industry movement," said Patricia Borowski, a senior vice president with the National Association of Professional Insurance Agents, which represents 15,000 agencies across the country.

Tracking programs

Ms. Borowski said that a handful of insurance carriers have begun offering customers the option of receiving a discount for volunteering the information in their recorders. But the program hasn't been very popular.

"Most people think they are far better drivers than they are," Mr. Borowski said. "Just because I don't get a ticket or get in an accident does not mean that 24/7 I am alert and don't make a mistake. I know that I am not perfect."

There should at least be notification to car buyers that their cars have event data recorders, said Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a public interest research center based in Washington.

Mr. Rotenberg asks why there are no safeguards to ensure that the information captured is accurate.

"The bottom line is, I don't think people want their cars spying on them," Mr. Rotenberg said.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is balancing those concerns with the agency's desire to improve highway safety.

The agency is expected to issue new rules this summer on the use of event data recorders in an effort to standardize the information that is stored by the devices.

"They can certainly provide us with significant data about crashes," said Eric Bolton, a NHTSA spokesman. The agency would be very interested in obtaining information from the devices to better understand the reasons for car accidents, he said.

Automakers' position

Automakers believe that the information recorded on the devices is useful and belongs to the customer – and should be used only with the car owner's permission.

"The data obtained through the use of EDRs helps manufacturers enhance safety of automobiles," said Charles Territo, director of communications for the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, a Washington-based trade group. "It gives a better understanding of crash events and how to avoid injuries."

Privacy concerns prompted California to pass legislation in 2004 that requires car manufacturers to disclose whether the devices have been installed. The law also prohibits disclosure of the data without the car owner's permission or a court order.

In addition, California and New York passed laws that prohibit rental car companies from using electronic surveillance to impose penalties if, for instance, a renter is driving erratically.

Maine, New Hampshire and Virginia have enacted similar measures. At least 20 other states are considering legislation, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures, based in Denver.

Automakers hope to avoid a patchwork of state laws. That is one reason Mr. Capuano and Ms. Bono expect to see their bill gain traction. Two years ago, a similar measure sponsored by the pair failed to make it out of the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

"Many motorists are unaware that their driving habits are being monitored and recorded by black boxes in their cars," Ms. Bono said.

The devices are designed to fine-tune safety systems, not reconstruct accidents, said Daniel Jarvis of Ford Motor Co.

l

Wednesday, July 12, 2006

Top 25 Censored Stories of 2006

http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2006/index.htm

Top 25 Censored Stories of 2006

#1 Bush Administration Moves to Eliminate Open Government

#2 Media Coverage Fails on Iraq: Fallujah and the Civilian Death

#3 Another Year of Distorted Election Coverage

#4 Surveillance Society Quietly Moves In

#5 U.S. Uses Tsunami to Military Advantage in Southeast Asia

#6 The Real Oil for Food Scam

#7 Journalists Face Unprecedented Dangers to Life and Livelihood

#8 Iraqi Farmers Threatened By Bremer’s Mandates

#9 Iran’s New Oil Trade System Challenges U.S. Currency

#10 Mountaintop Removal Threatens Ecosystem and Economy

#11 Universal Mental Screening Program Usurps Parental Rights

#12 Military in Iraq Contracts Human Rights Violators

#13 Rich Countries Fail to Live up to Global Pledges

#14 Corporations Win Big on Tort Reform, Justice Suffers

#15 Conservative Plan to Override Academic Freedom in the Classroom

#16 U.S. Plans for Hemispheric Integration Include Canada

#17 U.S. Uses South American Military Bases to Expand Control of the Region

#18 Little Known Stock Fraud Could Weaken U.S. Economy

#19 Child Wards of the State Used in AIDS Experiments

#20 American Indians Sue for Resources; Compensation Provided to Others

#21 New Immigration Plan Favors Business Over People

#22 Nanotechnology Offers Exciting Possibilities But Health Effects Need Scrutiny

#23 Plight of Palestinian Child Detainees Highlights Global Problem

#24 Ethiopian Indigenous Victims of Corporate and Government Resource Aspirations

#25 Homeland Security Was Designed to Fail

Bush Administration Fast-Tracks Formation of North American Union

http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=15954

Bush Administration Fast-Tracks Formation of North American Union

by Jerome R. Corsi
Posted Jul 11, 2006


With virtually no mention in the mainstream media, Commerce Secretary Carlos M. Gutierrez convened on June 15, the first meeting of the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC), an apparently extra-constitutional advisory group organized by the Department of Commerce (DOC) under the auspices of the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP).

A March 31 press release on the White House website, under the title “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America: Progress,” announced the formation of the NACC. The press release noted that the NACC would meet annually “with security and prosperity Ministers and will engage with senior government officials on an ongoing basis.” The “SPP Ministers” were not identified. Moreover, the term “Ministers” was an unusual reference to the U.S. government, especially when the founding fathers had taken such pains to rid the U.S. of all terminology that could be reminiscent of monarchical systems such as the British royalty against whom the Revolutionary War was aimed. Evidently, the reference was to Gutierrez, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, and Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, the three cabinet officers to whom the extensive SPP working groups organized in DOC are now reporting, as well as their cabinet level counterparts in Mexico and Canada.

The White House press release references no U.S. law or treaty under which the NACC was organized. Yet the press release notes that:

We are convinced that regulatory cooperation advances the productivity and competitiveness of our nations and helps to protect our health, safety and environment. For instance, cooperation on food safety will protect the public while at the same time facilitate the flow of goods. We affirm our commitment to strengthen regulatory cooperation in this and other key sectors and to have our central regulatory agencies complete a trilateral regulatory cooperation framework by 2007.
According to a notice on Trade.gov, a website maintained by the International Trade Administration of the DOC, the NACC membership consists of 10 “high-level business leaders” from Mexico, Canada, and the United States. An April 2006 report in the Mexican media quoted Angel Villalobos, undersecretary of International Trade Negotiations for Mexico’s Secretariat of Economy, as saying that nothing like NACC had ever before been created in NAFTA. Mr. Villalobos described NACC as “an umbrella organization within the SPP,” claiming further that SPP was created in 2005 to operate parallel to NAFTA.

A DOC press release on the day of the first NACC meeting seems to confirm that the “SPP Ministers” are the various cabinet level secretaries in the three countries to whom the SPP working groups report. The press release also references the March 23, 2005, Waco, Tex., meeting as the origin of SPP:
On March 23, 2005, leaders of North America launched the SPP. This initiative is meant to reduce trade barriers and facilitate economic growth, while improving the security and competitiveness of the continent. The leaders of North America confirmed their commitment to SPP when they met on March 31, 2006 in Cancun, Mexico.
The press release quotes Gutierrez as affirming the importance of NACC within SPP:

“Today is a continuation of President Bush’s strong commitment to our North American partners to focus on North America’s security and prosperity. The private sector is the driving force behind innovation and growth, and the private sector’s involvement in the SPP is key to enhancing North America’s competitive position in global markets.”

The Council of the Americas provided the more detail regarding the June 15, 2006 meeting of the NACC than was found on U.S. government websites. A NACC membership list found on the Council of the Americas’ website lists the U.S. members as coming form the following corporations (listed in alphabetic order): Campbell Soup Company, Chevron, Ford, FedEx, General Electric, General Motors, Kansas City Southern Industries, Lockheed Martin Corporation; Merck; Mittal Steel USA; New York Life; United Parcel Service; Wal-Mart; and Whirlpool.

A separate document on the Council of the Americas website presents a summarized transcript which claims that U.S. representatives in the June 15 meeting explained the composition of the U.S. delegation as follows:

“The U.S. section of the NACC has organized itself through a Secretariat -- composed of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Council of the Americas -- to maximize its efficiency and better communicate with its members.” Secretary Gutierrez was also paraphrased as stating, “The purpose of this meeting was to institutionalize the North American Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) and the NACC, so that the work will continue through changes in administrations.”

The Council of the Americas is a private organization with offices in New York and Washington, D.C. According to the organization’s own description, the group’s members “include some of the largest blue chip corporations domiciled in the United States, who, collectively, represent the vast bulk of U.S. investment in and trade with the rest of the Americas.” The Mexican -- U.S. Business Committee (MEXUS), organized as a standing committee of the Council of the Americas, is “the oldest bi-national private sector business organization with a focus on economic, commercial, and political relations in North America.” A MEXUS document on the Council of the Americas’ website self-credits MEXUS with having played “a critical role in the conceptual work that led to NAFTA,” plus active lobbying in that “its [MEXUS’s] members wore out significant shoe leather on Capital Hill, ultimately leading to successful passage.”

The Council of Canadians, a Canadian advocacy group that opposes NAFTA and SPP, charged that nine of the 10 appointees of the Canadian NACC delegation was drawn from the Canadian Council of Chief Executives. Maude Barlow, the National Chairperson for the Council of Canadians objected, stating, “This latest development clearly puts business leaders in the driver’s seat and gives them the green light to press forward for a North American model for business security and prosperity.” Ms. Barlow additionally questioned, “How truly accountable is the Harper government to the Canadian people when it gives preferential treatment to the big-business community in the design of its policies?”

Even a quick glance at the “North American Security and Prosperity” page of the Canadian Council of Chief Executives makes clear how ardently the organization champions SPP. The Canadian Council of Chief Executives was listed alongside the Mexican Council on Foreign Relations (COMEXI, Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internationales) and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) itself as being the sponsors for a March 2005 CFR-published task force report titled “Creating a North American Community -- Chairman’s Statement,” pubpublished before the March 23, 2005 trilateral proclamation of SPP in Waco, Texas. The three groups are also attributed with sponsoring the May 2005 CFR publication, “Building a North American Community.”

The creation of the NACC is following the course prescribed by Robert A. Pastor, the American University professor who is was co-chair of the CFR task force that produced the two CFR publications described in the above paragraph. At a press conference presenting the CFR report, “Building a North American Community,” Robert Pastor said:

The North American summit that occurred in Texas on March 23rd is a very important statement. But if it’s to be more than a photo opportunity, we felt that a second institution was essential, and that would be a North American advisory council made up of eminent individuals, appointed for terms that are longer than those of the governments, and staggered over time. This council would propose ideas for dealing with North American challenges, whether they be regulatory or transportation or infrastructure or education, and put forth options to the three leaders to consider ways to adopt a North American approach.
Robert Pastor described this council as playing an active policy role in the formation of his hoped-for North American Community.
And hopefully, the three leaders would turn to this North American council and say, “Look we’re getting wonderful advice on what we should do about North America as a whole. Why don’t you prepare a plan for us on education, on agriculture, on the environment, and we would consider that even as we consider the advice of our government.”
Dr. Pastor’s comments seem to prefigure the June 15, 2006 first meeting of the NACC, even down to describing the membership of his “advisory council” as consisting of ten members from each of the trilateral states. If Dr. Pastor’s roadmap continues to be predictive, we recommend a serious look at his book, "Toward a North American Community," in which he argues for the creation of a European Union-style fully institutionalized North American Union, constituting a super-regional government complete with a court, a parliament, a chief executive, and a new currency described as the “Amero.”

The Council of the Americas website lists five top priorities identified for the U.S. Section of the American Business: Energy Integration; Supply Chain Management/Trade Facilitation/ Customs Reform; Regulatory/ Standards issues -- Harmonization and Sharing of Best Practices; Counterfeiting and Piracy -- “Fake Free North America”; and Private Sector Involvement in Border Security and Infrastructure Projects.

A White House website shows photographs of President Bush, Mexico President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper at their March 31 joint news conference in Cancun, Mexico, shaking hands in front of a backdrop proclaiming “Cancun 2006. Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.” Increasingly, the three leaders are referring to the SPP as if the Waco, Texas press release announcement of March 23, 2005 constitutes an official new treaty-like trilateral status, advancing the trilateral partnership forward into a more institutional phase that can be termed at a minimum “NAFTA-Plus.”

At the Cancun press conference, Prime Minister Harper confirmed that the decision had been reached to advance SPP by forming NACC:
During my meetings with Presidents Bush and Fox, we reviewed the progress of our Security and Prosperity Partnership, which provides a framework to advance the common interests in the areas of security, prosperity, and quality of life.

We committed to further engage the private sector. We’ve agreed to set up a North American Competitiveness Council, made up of business leaders from all three countries, to advise us on ways to improve the competitiveness of our economies. They will meet with our ministers, identify priorities, and make sure we follow up and implement them.
In his comments at the Cancun press conference, President Bush also affirmed the presence of unnamed business leaders who had attended the trilateral summit meeting. President Bush commented, “I want to thank the CEOs and the business leaders from the three countries who are here.”

The DOC's SPP website announcing the formation of NACC provides no information as to the membership requirements, the selection process, or the terms of the members appointed to the NACC. Nor is there any discussion of who pays for the travel expenses and the time of the participants. We find no charter published for the NACC, or any other specific delineation of roles and responsibilities, or reporting authority (except for a mention of the “SPP Ministers”). Equally lacking is a description of the enabling legislation or treaty under which the NACC operates.

According to an attendance list produced by the Council of the Americas, the June 15, 2006 meeting of the NACC was attended by Geri Word, deputy director of Office of NAFTA and Inter-American Affairs in the U.S. Department of Commerce; Dan Fisk, senior director for Western Hemisphere Affairs at the National Security Council; Al Martinez-Fonts, director of the Office of the Private Sector in the U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Elizabeth “Betsy” Whitaker, deputy assistant secretary of Western Hemisphere Affairs at the U.S. Department of State; and Christopher Moore, deputy assistant secretary in the Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs at the U.S. Department of State.

Mr. Corsi is the author of several books, including "Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry" (along with John O'Neill), "Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil" (along with Craig R. Smith), and "Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American Politicians." He is a frequent guest on the G. Gordon Liddy radio show. He will soon co-author a new book with Jim Gilchrist on the Minuteman Project.

Scholars for 9/11 Truth Under Attack - children threatened by name

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2006/7/prweb406904.htm

Scholars for 9/11 Truth Under Attack

Download this press release as an Adobe PDF document.


Member's children threatened by name; teacher's position under assault.

Duluth, MN (PRWEB) July 4, 2006 --- The author of an article about the attack on the World Trade Center has found himself under attack for having published it in a new on-line publication, Journal of 9/11 Studies. Entitled "The Third Elephant", the article discusses evidence that a third airplane was captured on video at the time of the WTC attack. He has now received a thinly-veiled threat against his children, who are cited by name, suggesting it would be a good idea if his article were to simply "go away".

When teachers are intimidated against seeking and speaking truth on a campus renowned for its liberal and progressive traditions, we are in trouble
Scholars for 9/11 Truth is a non-partisan society of experts and scholars committed to exposing falsehoods and revealing truths about the events of 9/11. The journal, which is archived at journalof911studies.com, is its latest attempt to create forums for discussion and debate about these important issues beyond its web site, which is archived at st911.org. The author, Reynolds Dixon, a writer and Professor of English, former lecturer and Fellow at Stanford University, has withdrawn from the society.

"Threats of this kind have no place in a democratic nation", said James H. Fetzer, the founder of S9/11T. "These are the tactics of brown-shirts and totalitarians who fear the discussion of controversial questions that threaten the government's control over the governed. This is a despicable act and we are not going to back down!" He added that the organization itself will assume responsibility for the study, which Reynolds has relinquished. "We cannot allow advances in understanding what happened on 9/11 to be suppressed by threats to our members. The stakes are simply too high."

In Wisconsin, another member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, Kevin Barrett, who has been active in efforts to inform the American people about discoveries that have been made by Scholars--including that the Twin Towers were destroyed, not by the impact of airplanes or the ensuing fires, but by sophisticated controlled demolition; that Vice President Dick Cheney gave a "stand down" order to not shoot down the plane approaching the Pentagon; and that the FBI has now confirmed that it has "no hard evidence" connecting Osama bin Laden to 9/11--confronts the loss of his job.

A Wisconsin legislator, Stephen Nass, Republican of Whitewater, has called for the University of Wisconsin-Madison to immediately fire him from his teaching position. The UW Office of the Provost has announced that it will conduct a 10-day review of Barrett's plans for an introductory fall course in Islam and of his past performance as a teacher at UW-Madison. Provost Patrick Farrell has endorsed his freedom of speech, but "We have an obligation to insure that his course content is academically appropriate, of high quality, and that he is not imposing his views on his students."

Prominent experts and scholars who are members of S9/11T include Steven Jones, a professor of physics at Brigham Young University; Morgan Reynolds, former Chief Economist for the Department of Labor in the George W. Bush administration; Bob Bowman, who directed research on the "Star Wars" program in both Republican and Democratic administrations; Andreas von Buelow, the former director of Science and Technology for Germany; and David Ray Griffin, professor emeritus of theology at the Claremont Graduate School and author or editor of four books on the events of 9/11.

Concern about academic freedom at UW-Madison extends beyond the Scholars group. Ron Rattner, an attorney from San Francisco, CA, for example, has written to Provost Farrell with the observation that, "When teachers are intimidated against seeking and speaking truth on a campus renowned for its liberal and progressive traditions, we are in trouble". He added, "Universities are for inquiries, not inquisitions. UW must operate in the traditions of La Follette, not McCarthy". Robert La Follette was noted as a progressive leader, while Joe McCarthy portrayed his opponents as subversives.

Fetzer observed that the right wing is continuing to attack faculty who speak out on 9/11. "During an appearance on Hannity & Colmes (June 22, 2006), with Ollie North sitting in for Hannity, I made points about controlled demolition, the "stand down" order, and the FBI's position," he said, "but they were more interested in whether I was discussing these things with my students than whether they were true." On a subsequent appearance on Laura Ingraham's program (June 30, 2006), "She had her staff chanting about 'nutty professors' before I was even introduced. Then, after I made some telling points at the end of the program, they edited their archived copy and cut it off after a long harangue attacking me. That is intellectually dishonest."

Many other members of S9/11T, including Morgan Reynolds and David Ray Griffin, have spoken out in defense of academic freedom and in opposition to censorship and curtailing research into 9/11. "These nasty threats against the children of one member and the freedom of speech of another", Fetzer said, "make a sorry statement about this nation on the eve of the 4th of July." Coincidentally, Fetzer will appear with Barrett at the Mid-West Social Forum on Sunday, July 9, 2006, from 9-10:30 AM, at the Student Union of UW-Milwaukee, to discuss 9/11.

Arms Against War

http://www.armsagainstwar.info/

"ARMS AGAINST WAR is an individual declaration of a desire for an end to the war in Iraq. The wearing of a strip of any white fabric is an indication that the wearer opposes this war - regardless of their political views, religion, location or race. This simple, free and instant form of protest has come about in order to show unity and agreement on one point - an end to the war in Iraq - whatever your individual reasons for thinking so. So please, if you believe in this one statement "I WANT AN END TO THE WAR IN IRAQ" - then please tear a white strip of fabric and tie it around your arm - the intention is to go on wearing these as a full time, peaceful demonstration until the war ends, please join us in this action. No money wanted, no signature, no time, no purchase necessary - only your viewpoint, on this one issue, is required to participate. Thank you."

Aids HIV Bayer

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/july2006/120706Bayer.htm

"This clip from Scarborough Country highlights how Bayer knowingly dumped medicine that was known to be contaminated with AIDS virus on the European market after it killed people in America."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XS3mhjt7TrY&search=Bayer

Tuesday, July 11, 2006

Rep. Congressman: Impeach Bush For Violating Constitution - Not Partisan Payback

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2006/100706impeachbush.htm

Rep. Congressman: Impeach Bush For Violating Constitution - Not Partisan Payback
Says American Union is bellwether for world government

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | July 10 2006

Republican Congressman Ron Paul says President Bush has presided over a doctrine of violating the Constitution at every turn and that he should be impeached - but that likely Democratic efforts to do so will be in the interests of playing politics and not the health of the nation.

During an interview with Alex Jones on the GCN Radio network, Paul outlined the likely scenario as to how impeachment proceedings would unfold.

"I'd be surprised if they win both - I think they're going to win one body and if they win the House right now they do not say they would have an impeachment but I think the way that place operates I think they probably will make every effort," said Paul.

"If they happened to have a ten or fifteen vote margin that would be a political thing - it would be payback time."

Paul said that Bush should be impeached not under the umbrella of partisan vengeance but for ceaselessly breaking the laws of the land.

"I would have trouble arguing that he's been a Constitutional President and once you violate the Constitution and be proven to do that I think these people should be removed from office."

Opining that the US had entered a period of "soft fascism," Paul noted that the legacy of the Bush administration has been the total abandonment of Constitutional principles.

"Congress has generously ignored the Constitution while the President flaunts it, the courts have ignored it and they get in the business of legislating so there's no respect for the rule of law." said Paul.

"When the Presidents signs all these bills and then adds statements after saying I have no intention of following it - he's in a way signing it and vetoing - so in his mind he's vetoing a lot of bills, in our mind under the rule of law he hasn't vetoed a thing."

Asked what the ultimate agenda was behind the American Union and the push on behalf of the Bush administration to homogenize the US with Mexico and Canada, Paul was clear in his response.

"I think the goal is one world government - we have not only the U.N. - we have the WTO, the IMF, the World Bank, then we have all the subsidiaries like NAFTA and hemispheric governments, highways coming in."

"I just hope and pray that we can wake up enough people," said Paul, noting that Texans in his own backyard were more aware of Bush selling out the country for an American Union than anyone in Washington.

Prison Planet.tv members can hear this entire interview by clicking here. Please consider subscribing to Prison Planet.tv by clicking here.

Exposing The Real Racists In The Immigration Debate

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2006/030506realracists.htm

Exposing The Real Racists In The Immigration Debate
"Day without gringos" sums it up

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | May 3 2006

The Associated Press encapsulated the sentiment of the immigration protesters in the first sentence of its report yesterday in stating that the boycotts were characterized as a "day without gringos."

Imagine what the reaction would be if white middle class Americans marched in their millions and called the event "a day without blacks." But it isn't going to happen because ours isn't the racist side of the immigration 'debate'.

The real racists and ringleaders of this week's demonstrations are extremist adherents to the militant La Raca philosophy. Their Mein Kampf is a plan to ethnically cleanse America of whites, blacks and dissenting Hispanics, leaving just the 'super race' to install the mythical kingdom of Atzlan.

Sound bizarre? We have laboriously documented this open call for genocide on the part of Hispanic extremists on multiple occasions.

Lou Dobbs was correct in saying that radical groups were behind the protests but to identify ANSWER, a milquetoast socialist anti-war group as the kingpin is misleading. The real protagonists are the violently hateful and racist la reconquista outfits that seek to completely marginalize and brutally oppress white and black Americans while seizing control of the entire southern and western states of America.


However, he was spot on in highlighting establishment media spin that this was something other than illegal immigrants demanding amnesty and wide open borders, a demand the Bush administration has done its best to implement every step of the way.

Try walking over the border into Mexico, a corrupt police state hellhole that the demonstrators seem to think is all milk and honey. If you make it past the feverish Mexican military, armed los Zetas paramilitary forces and drug running gangs of every description that are killing American citizens, border patrol and police on a weekly basis, try hiring a car, try opening a bank account, try getting a job, try staging a protest. At best you'll be immediately deported, at worst you'll be beaten to death.

Borders don't just protect the security of a country, they protect its fragile economy. The illegals' zeal in causing America's race to the bottom will ensure second world status and the dollar will cease competing with the Euro and begin worrying about staying above the peso.

If dumbbell liberals who don't understand that it is a Neo-Con agenda to create the justification for mass amnesty want to see their trendy cocktail bars and Starbuck's coffee shops replaced with slum houses and ghettos then they should continue to support the actions of a horde of rioting criminal racists.

Generalissimo Bush - A Clear And Present Danger To The Republic

http://www.rense.com/general72/fene.htm

Generalissimo Bush -
A Clear And Present
Danger To The Republic

By Dave Lindorff
7-9-6
Commander-in-Chief: an officer who has supreme command of military forces; in the U.S. the president; used as an honorific title to denote the President of the United States, as commander of the nationâ·s armed forces.
Generalissimo: a supreme commander of the combined armed forces in some countries, who often also has political power.
The major crisis facing American democracy and its long-standing Republican form of government, especially the carefully crafted tri-partite separation of powers into executive, judicial and legislative, is at root the result of the deliberate conflation by President Bush and Vice President Cheney of the title commander in chief with the concept of generalissimo--a role exemplified by such benighted leaders as Mussolini and Franco in Europe, Chiang Kai-shek in Taiwan, and a host of Latin American dictators.
The authors of America's Constitution added the title and role of commander in chief to that of president, specifically out of concern about a possible military coup. Their idea was to ensure that as commander in chief, a president answerable to Congress and the people would outrank any general in the American governmental system.
Bush has taken that bare bones role, which has no relationship to his political duties as chief executive, and conjured up out of thin air the theory that "in time of war" his position as commander in chief allows him to assume the powers of both the legislature and the judiciary, and to override such inconvenient hindrances to executive authority as the Bill of Rights and common law protections such as habeas corpus dating back as much as 800 years.
He has, in effect, converted the very limited concept of commander in chief, which was really never anything more than a rank placing him above five-star general, to that of generalissimo, which is just another term for dictator.
Consider the fact that a ranking four-star general, even the joint chief of staff at the Pentagon, has no authority over the ordinary U.S. citizen. Except under a declaration of martial law, such a general can't even order a civilian not to cross the street. Nor can the president, in his role as commander in chief.
A generalissimo, however, besides being the top officer in the military, is also the absolute ruler over the populace and the other parts of the government. He answers only to himself, and makes and enforces the laws as he sees fit. This is exactly the power that President Bush is claiming as commander in chief.
When Bush argues, as he attempted to do unsuccessfully in the recently decided Hamdan case before the US Supreme Court, that as "commander in chief" he can decide the fate of captured fighters in the war in Afghanistan, or the so-called "War on Terror," and can arbitrarily ignore the Third Geneva Convention on the Treatment of Captured Prisoners of War, despite the US having signed that treaty and incorporated it into the US Criminal Code, when he claims the right, as he did in the case of US citizen Jose Padilla and several other Americans, to declare certain people to be "enemy combatants" and to revoke their rights of citizenship, when he claims the right to ignore duly passed acts of Congress, and to violate laws and such rights as the Fourth Amendment, as he has done in the case of the warrantless spying on citizens by the National Security Agency, he is claiming the power of a generalissimo, not of a commander in chief.
(It is significant to note that after the Supreme Court ruled against his commander-in-chief argument that he had the right to ignore the Geneva Conventions in Guantanamo, Bush, instead of saying he would "of course comply" with the court's ruling, said he was "willing to comply" with the decision, clearly implying that he didn't feel compelled to comply with a decision by the High Court.)
Ideally, Congress would be challenging this assault on its own authority by a megalomaniacal president. Ideally the federal courts would be slapping down this affront to the Constitution. But Congress is in the hands of the presidentâ·s party, and Republicans in Congress are content to sit on their hands as the Constitution they swore to uphold and defend is trashed. The Democratic "opposition" party, meanwhile, has been so afraid of being accused of "treason," or of being "soft on terrorism," that they have done little or nothing to block the president's power grabs. Many Democrats in Congress have even endorsed the nomination of judges like John Roberts and Sam Alito who back the president's dictatorial ambitions. And the Supreme Court, as well as the lower courts, are being packed with apologists for unfettered presidential power.
If we Americans do not demand that Congress stand up to this unconstitutional power grab, if we do not demand that only those who believe in the concept of separation of powers and who share the founders' abiding fear of an overly powerful presidency be elevated to the federal bench, and if we do not start publicly protesting this perversion of the presidency, American democracy could be on its last legs.
Italy suffered mightily as a strutting small-minded man with a grotesquely inflated ego launched that country into pointless wars of aggression in the Middle East, and usurped all governmental power, calling himself generalissimo.
America today is perilously close to a reprise of that tragedy, as another strutting small-minded man with a similarly grotesquely inflated ego launches the nation into pointless wars of aggression in the Middle East and usurps governmental power, calling himself commander in chief.

Uranium bombing in Iraq contaminates Europe

http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/20060708064938448

Environment
Uranium bombing in Iraq contaminates Europe

(San Francisco) Nine days after the start of the American president's 2003 "shock and awe" uranium bombing campaign in Baghdad, an invisible radioactive uranium oxide gas cloud swept through Britain's towns and countryside and throughout Europe.

Respected scientists reported on the unrevealed gas cloud after conducting research on specialized high volume air filters in England. Dr. Chris Busby and Saoirse Morgan stunned Europe in a Sunday Times of London article on Feb. 19, 2006. Their scientific paper, released March 1st, 2006, [1] proved the event. With all the vigor of delusional drunkards, British nuclear and military spokesmen predictably denied the reality of an invisible radioactive cloud.

The military claimed that a Chernobyl-like event in the area was probably responsible, but no explosive meltdowns of operating reactor cores have been reported or observed in 2006 anywhere in the world. Evidence of the truth of the gas cloud panicked the military into frantic, irrational, ludicrous denials. The military spin was later refined and the new Chernobyl claim quietly dropped.

In America, lightweight wannabe spin doctor Dan Fahey issued the cover up talking points. [2] The "nuke sycophants" will take up these siren call lies as per instructions.

Bush's radioactive "shock and awe" gas cloud descended on Britain and Europe like a warm, deadly ticking blanket and stayed throughout the American and British shock and awe bombing campaign in 2003. Bush's radioactive cloud lasted more than five weeks at high radioactive particle concentration levels. There is no gas mask filter fine enough to trap this radioactive gas and protect humans.

At Aldermaston, England, where the data was collected and where the British Atomic Weapons Establishment, complete with air monitoring facilities, is located, the deadly uranium oxide gas measured about 48,000 radioactive particles per square meter. The average radioactive dose, according to official government index based calculations, was about 23 million radioactive particles for the average adult male in Britain and Europe.

Yes, people breathed this poison gas, absolutely. People throughout England and presumably throughout Europe breathed in large quantities of this radioactive uranium poison gas.

What are the effects of the poison gas cloud? After a steady decline for 41 years, the infant death rate has started inching up, many researchers think because of the Central Asian nuclear wars. The infant death rate is the most sensitive measure of the health of the human race. Like the proverbial canaries in a coal mine, the tiniest babies die first.

George W. Bush, as the current appointed manager of the senior American political and military establishments, oversees a vast empire that knows exactly what the effect of millions of pounds of deadly weaponized radioactive ceramic uranium oxide gas and tiny aerosols are on the health of people throughout the world. They used uranium munitions in Iraq anyway.

The American political and military leaders wanted to use genocidal weapons. You might even say the U.S. military went out of their way to use these radiation-based genocidal weapons in Iraq. Lots of them, too.

Indeed, the American permanent war establishment has known the effect of poisonous uranium oxide gas since 1943. A declassified World War II memo to Gen. Leslie Groves, director of the ultra-secretive Manhattan Project to make atomic bombs, listed two reasons to use radioactive gas: One was to kill people, and the other was to contaminate their land. [3]

A British newspaper quotes Dr. Busby, a government adviser on radiation, as saying: "This research shows that rather than remaining near the target, as claimed by the military, depleted uranium weapons contaminate both locals and whole populations hundreds to thousands of miles away." [4]

There were and are laws in England that require notification of the government when levels of radioactivity are reached around the nuclear weapons complex at Aldermaston. No notification was made. When the records were requested, the clearly labeled "shock and awe" time frame data was omitted.

The Defense Procurement Agency in Bristol supplied the missing data to scientists Busby and Morgan. The real British patriots are the ones who provided the deleted incriminating data to Busby and Morgan.

Bush and his faithful followers, the neocon fascists, will be remembered as securing their place in history by exposing hundreds of millions of people to high levels of internal radiation poisoning. Make no mistake about it; this is real radioactive uranium gas. The Americans used this genetics changing and killing weapon on men, women and children. It made no difference to the Americans.

The citizen opposition liberal groups in America who only stand on the street corners with signs are misdirecting legitimate citizen outrage and protest. These groups are more than just not effective; they contribute to the protection of the multi-national corporations, senior political and military leaders involved in these pre-planned war crimes.

About ineffective protests, the famous author Ward Churchill says: "(N)o one really cares a whit that a sector of the beneficiary population (American protesters) has chosen to bear a sort of perpetual 'moral witness' to the crimes committed against the Third World. What they do care about is whether such witnesses translate their 'professions of outrage' into whatever kinds of actions may be necessary to actually put an end to the horror." [14] When will the protesters awaken and take action to put an end to this horror? Never? Sometime? When?

A well planned effort

The American military is nothing if not well planned. When the decision was made to go nuclear in conventional warfare with the promiscuous use of radiation dispersing uranium weapons, including land mines, bullets, shells, missiles and bombs, the proper and correct Army rules and regulations for radiological clean-up were created as well. These rules have the force of American law throughout the world. However, the same government that adopted these rules is not following them, even in the United States.

Army Rules and Regulations on Radiation Poisoning (AR 700-48 and TB 9-1300-278) [15] unambiguously specify that U.S. troops and local civilians exposed to radiation poisoning will be treated. Radiation casualties exist, and provisions are made for their care as best as can be done for a non-curable bystander affliction: radiation poisoning. Clean and treat rules also apply; they are just not obeyed.

In short, the regulations say that if the U.S. military is going to use radioactive weapons, then it must clean up the radiological contamination and treat the casualties. It is consistent with the philosophy of some "if you break it, fix it" former U.S. military leaders. The applicable rules and regulations are a common sense approach and the only responsible radiological warfare position for the only superpower on the planet.

The rules are not followed even in the United States itself [5] but are buried away in their mountains of paperwork. Why has this approach been rejected by the senior U.S. political leadership? http://tinyurl.com/bk2yn

Marion Fulk, a consultant physicist at the Lawrence Livermore Nuclear Weapons Lab, is one of the original Manhattan Project scientists. When asked if the main purpose for using depleted uranium was for destroying things and killing people, Fulk was more specific: "I would say that it is the perfect weapon for killing lots of people." [6]

Dr. Rosalie Bertell, a respected scientist who serves on a variety of Pentagon committees, says about 1.3 billion people have already been killed, maimed or diseased since the nuclear age started. [7] Is this the Pentagon's purpose for using uranium munitions and rejecting the legally mandated task to treat and clean?

Most reasonable people would agree that racking up 1.3 billion people killed or maimed since the beginning of the nuclear age and the American uranium bombing tragedy spreading the gas cloud to Europe and Britain is not the "treat and clean" approach to radioactive warfare set out in the regulations.

On the contrary, the Bush radioactive gas cloud is just the opposite. The plain purpose of exposing hundreds of millions of people would seem to be to kill and sicken more people. As a rare Pentagon admission said, "The properties of uranium do not change."

Famed former Lawrence Livermore Nuclear Weapons Lab scientist Leuren Moret has spoken about the dangers of so-called "depleted uranium" in 42 countries. In "Exotic Weapons," the author, radio and film celebrity states, "Since 1991, the continued U.S. military use of dirty bombs, dirty missiles and dirty bullets threatens humanity and all living things ... and is turning Planet Earth into a death star." [8] [12]

Massive carpet bombing of whole countries with uranium bombs appears to be the current war fighting plan of the U.S. military. Unfortunately, U.S. troops are the first to be sacrificed on the altar of the neocon warfare plan for total global domination.

As former U.S. Secretary of State and National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger said, "Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy." [9] American political and military leaders never asked the "pawns" or troops if that was OK.

In the authoritative World Affairs Journal, Moret states: "The Korea Times reported on Dec. 23, 2005, that the U.S. military has 2.7 million depleted uranium bombs [pre-positioned] in South Korea. It is understandable why North Korea wants nuclear weapons." [10]

North Korea is just slightly smaller than the American state of Mississippi. Two million seven hundred uranium bombs is enough to carpet bomb with workhorse Air Force B-52s at the rate of 10 bombs per square mile. Some researchers believe that grid bombing with uranium bombs was used in the American war in the former Yugoslavia. There is clear circumstantial evidence that carpet bombing with genocidal weapons is the preferred response of the American military to local resistance efforts.

The San Francisco-based humanitarian and war crimes lawyer Karen Parker states unequivocally that the use of depleted uranium in American/U.K. weapons in Iraq, Afghanistan and the former Yugoslavia is a war crime. War crimes are punishable by imprisonment or execution, typically by hanging or a firing squad.

America's war criminal class of senior politicians and military leaders has a powerful reason to lie about using genocidal weapons for at least 15 years in Central Asia - their very lives depend on it. In Johnny's Dad's words, the senior leaders are "filthy rotten scum." [16]

Upcoming war crimes trial

The chief Nuremberg war crimes prosecutor speaks knowingly and directly across more than 50 years to resolutely instruct American citizens on exactly what our duty is today, right now: "Individuals have international duties which transcend the national obligations of obedience … therefore have the duty to violate domestic laws to prevent crimes against peace and humanity from occurring." [11]

The statement was affirmed by the Nuremberg Tribunal and is now international law and, by extension, American law. It is our duty as Americans to prevent crimes against peace and humanity. The fascist administration now controlling America and the U.S. military cannot be allowed to continue these crimes. The world and international law holds us all accountable, and the price is dear.

It is time to impeach and imprison members of our government for their war crimes commensurate with their degree of complicity and guilt. If the House will not impeach and the Senate will not put them on trial; then we, all 300 million Americans, have a problem.

We all are citizens of this country and the world, and, as such, we must acknowledge the incontrovertible evidence of war crimes by the leaders of the American Expeditionary Forces in Iraq with the use of genocidal weapons. Bush and others crossed the line long ago when they lied to get us into the Iraq War.

They continue to lie about the damage being done with uranium weapons. One of the comforts history provides us is a road map out of unthinkable situations, to a more or less tenable, workable future.

The injured and maimed and families of the dead are due treatment and/or compensation, the cleanup must be initiated and whole countries rebuilt. That is the true legacy of the neocons, the new American Nazis.

What people can do

Every single day thousands of American military and government workers handle thousands of "sensitive" papers that "prove" the War Crimes of the American Government's senior political and military leaders.

These thousands of people could, if they wanted to, create havoc in the fascist administration by providing these incriminating papers and the "smoking guns" of innumerable crimes they hold to the public: A "paper blizzard" to teach a whole new generation that what's right is right.

About 40 years ago, it was thousands of pages of the "Pentagon Papers" that did the trick with the illegal Viet Nam War and President Nixon. Thousands more pages are needed now.

The neocon or neolib papers like the disgraced New York Times or the conservative phantom Washington Post no longer will do the right thing. The timid NYT took almost a year to publish the proof of illegal NSA government spying on American citizens. Bush then bragged about the illegal spying on network prime time television.

We do not need "timid" now. Far less than that forced Nixon to leave the president's office.

Do what you think best

To follow up on these ideas, the following Speaker's Group and individuals are presented to you for your important events. Speaker's fees are required.

Writers & Warriors Speakers Group

Contact Bob Nichols at bob.bobnichols@gmail.com for college distinguished lecture series speakers, commencement speakers, people's events and rallies. Available speakers include Leuren Moret, Dr. Doug Rokke, Dennis Kyne, Karen Parker and Bob Nichols.

Topics generally include those of interest in building a positive culture in the midst of a militarized society and items of interest in nuclear warfare.

A well known video, "The 14 Characteristics of Fascism," from Dr. Lawrence Britt, Ph.D., Mike Malloy and Eric Bumrich is a great, short video. See http://www.bushflash.com/14.html. It is only a few minutes long but goes a long way in telling why American leaders embrace the rampant use of genocidal weapons. The "14 Points" video is a great way to start a meeting.

The following documents were consulted in the preparation of this essay.

1. Dr. Chris Busby and Saoirse Morgan, "Did the use of uranium weapons in Gulf War 2 result in contamination of Europe?" March 1, 2006, "European Biology and Bioelectromagnetics." http://www.llrc.org/du/subtopic/aldermastonrept.htm

2. Dan Fahey's instructions to his secretary, Jack Cohen, for distribution, du-list@yahoogroups, Feb. 26, 2006, 11:52 p.m.

3. Letter to Congessman McDermott, Attachment 2. Declassified memo to general L.R. Groves, director of the Manhattan Project, Oct. 30, 1943. http://tinyurl.com/93eq9

4. The Sunday Times, Britain, Feb. 19, 2006, "UK radiation jump blamed on Iraq shells," quoting Dr. Chris Busby.

5. Bob Nichols, "Radioactive Tank No. 9 comes limping home," San Francisco Bay View newspaper. http://tinyurl.com/bk2yn

6. Marion Fulk quoted in the San Francisco Bay View newspaper by Leuren Moret in "Depleted uranium: Dirty bombs, dirty missiles, dirty bullets - A death sentence here and abroad," Aug 18, 2004. http://www.sfbayview.com/081804/Depleteduranium081804.shtml

7. Rosalie Bertell, Ph.D., "Planet Earth: The Latest Weapon of War." http://tinyurl.com/gf9dj

8. Leuren Moret, "Planet Earth as a Weapon and Target," World Affairs Journal, Vol. 9, No. 4, Winter 2005. http://tinyurl.com/e6d8v

9. Kissinger's quote regarding military men comes from Chapter 14, which extensively discusses Al Haig, Kissinger and other Nixon staff advisors' negotiations and differences over national security issues during the 1969-1974 period. The exact, direct quote marks begin with the word 'dumb' and terminate after the word 'used.' Source: Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, "The Final Days," second Touchstone paperback edition (1994), chapter 14, pp. 194-195.

10. Leuren Moret.

11. War Crimes Watch, http://tinyurl.com/k6xb3

12. Documentary "Beyond Treason" with Moret, Rokke and Dennis Kyne. http://www.beyondtreason.com/ Documentary "Blowin' in the Wind" with Moret and Rokke. http://www.bsharp.net.au/

13. Dissent Voice, Bob Nichols. "There Are No Words: Radiation in Iraq equals 250,000 Nagasaki Bombs ...." http://tinyurl.com/yqxoe

14. Ward Churchill, "The Ghosts of 9-1-1: Reflections on History, Justice and Roosting Chickens," Alternative Press Review http://tinyurl.com/fvhzn

15. Army Regulation 700-48 and Technical Bulletin 9-1300-278 can be found easily at the Traprock Peace Site. http://tinyurl.com/erjue and http://tinyurl.com/pzcrm And the regulations themselves, http://tinyurl.com/kl2r2 and http://tinyurl.com/jzha8 Adobe .pdf versions are also available for download from Traprock Peace Center.

16. "Johnny Got a Gun - Protest Song" by Johnny's Dad. Uranium Weapon Anthem. Distribute freely: http://tinyurl.com/k2zze

This author won a prized Project Censored Award for an article on depleted uranium munitions in October 2004. The article was titled "There Are No Words." http://tinyurl.com/yqxoe (headlined in the Bay View "Radiation in Iraq equals 250,000 Nagasaki bombs," http://www.sfbayview.com/041404/radiationiniraq041404.shtml. [13] Turns out that story was but Part One, a thing I never suspected would be so. This article is Part Two and serves as an update for the war fighting activities of the senior American political and military leaders.

Bob Nichols is a Project Censored Award Winner. He is a correspondent for the San Francisco Bay View newspaper and a frequent contributor to various on line publications. Nichols is completing a book based on 15 years of nuclear war in Central Asia. Nichols is a former employee of the McAlester Army Ammunition Plant. Nichols can be reached by email. You are encouraged to write bob.bobnichols@gmail.com